see below
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Cooper [mailto:ian@the-coopers.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:00 PM
> To: cdn@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: CNAP - very quick comment
>
>
> Apologies for the abruptness of this, but having just taken a
> quick scan of
> the draft the absolute first thing you're going to want to address is:
>
> 1) You only consider IPv4; no way will this fly far if that's
> the case.
>
-- this should not be the case
> Also:
>
> 2) If the "cnas" in your ABNF is analagous to "content
> network AS" you're
> going to want to increase the size of the field. (Since you
> appear to have
> ASCII you might want to consider going hex.) [I guess it
> might be suitable
> to reserve private space that can be re-used, but I'd be
> happier to see a
> default that provided for more than 10,000 content networks.]
>
-- point well taken, i believe that there is an editor note on that.
abbie
>