[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Definition of ISPs

To: "Mike O'Dell" <mo@uu.net>
Subject: Re: Definition of ISPs
From: Barbara Fraser <byf@cert.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:48:12 -0400
Cc: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>, Tristan.Debeaupuis@hsc.fr (Tristan Debeaupuis), randy@psg.com (Randy Bush), grip-wg@uu.net (GRIP WG), mo@uu.net
Comment: grip-wg mailing list add/drop requests to Majordomo@TransSys.COM
In-reply-to: <QQgxvj18027.199907141353@neserve0.corp.us.uu.net>
References: <Your message of "Wed, 14 Jul 1999 07:15:15 EDT." <4.1.19990714070051.0105c2e0@127.0.0.1>

Mike,

Help me understand why defining the way you are using a term within a
document is a problem? A large majority of IETF documents do such things to
make it easier for the reader to understand what the document is trying to
communicate.

Barb

At 09:53 AM 7/14/99 -0400, Mike O'Dell wrote:
>
>the more you work on this definition, the more trouble it becomes.
>
>why do you find it so important to include this definition??
>
>	-mo

References:
- Re: Definition of ISPs
  - From: Barbara Fraser <byf@cert.org>
- Re: Definition of ISPs
  - From: "Mike O'Dell" <mo@uu.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Definition of ISPs
Next by Date: RFC 2644 on Changing the Default for Directed Broadcasts in Routers
Previous by thread: Re: Definition of ISPs
Next by thread: Re: Definition of ISPs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread