[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compatibility requirements
- To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>, idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: Compatibility requirements
- From: James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:00:05 +0800
- Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 20:06:36 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
Ignore me. I just thought of at least 2 solution how this can be overcome :PPP
-James Seng
James Seng wrote:
> Was doing editing on a new updated draft. But before I add this into the
> requirement draft, one question.
>
> If the canonicalization is done at the client, then it will break the
> requirement "The same name resolution request should generate the same
> response, regardless of the location (or localisation settings) of the
> resolver, the master server and any slave or caching servers involved."
>
> Logic is pretty obvious.
>
> I will leave this out first until we can get an consensus on this.
>
> -James Seng