[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Re: IDN Charter
- To: phoffman@imc.org (Paul Hoffman / IMC)
- Subject: Re: [idn] Re: IDN Charter
- From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 10:47:01 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 10:47:32 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
% >The Action Item(s) for the Working Group are
% >
% > 1. An Informational RFC specifying the requirements for providing
% > Internationalized access to domain names. The document
% > should provide guidance for development solutions to this problem,
% > taking localized (e.g. writing order) and related operational issues
% > into consideration.
% >
% > 2. An Informational RFC or RFC's documenting the various proposals
% > and Implementations of Internationalization (i18n) of Domain Names.
% > The document(s) should also provide a technical evaluation of the
% > proposals by the Working Group.
%
% The protocols will be *Informational* RFCs? That seems non-sensical to me.
% I think the second item should be the protocol(s) with at least one of them
% ready for standards track.
%
% --Paul Hoffman, Director
% --Internet Mail Consortium
The first is a requirements doc, not a protocol spec and so
informational is 'prolly right.
The second suite should be experimental.
--bill