Re: [idn] idn charter

[bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich)]

For the record, I don't agree with the new paragraph requested by IESG, as
it will be impossible to develop new capabilites for DNS if we are tied to
all the current implementations on the Internet.

But let's move forward, please.

Regards,

Bill Semich

At 09:13 AM 2/3/00 +0800, James Seng wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I agreed with Marc assessment. I suggest we move forward with the charter
with
>the modification from IESG. 
>
>-James Seng
>
>Marc Blanchet wrote:
>>  - while not trying at all to push the agenda, I think we have a very
>> good charter now, that had a concensus before, and the current
>> modifications make more precision while not changing the whole idea of
>> the wg.
>>  - you've begun very good work on the req doc, but without a wg, any doc
>> is not very useful.
>>  - to have a wg formed asap, we can get final iesg approval at their
>> next telechat which is very soon if I remember well, and is probably one
>> of the last, if not the last one, in order to have the wg formed for the
>> next ietf.
>>  - so the final step for all of us is to agree on the charter and then
>> move on to the technical work
>>  - it is also possible in the future to change the charter, so it is not
>> a fixed contract forever.
>> 
>> - Can we move on and agree on the charter?
>> - to be sure to get the iesg approval at the next telechat, can we agree
>> on it before the end of the week?
>> 
>> Marc.
>
>
Bill Semich
President and Founder
.NU Domain Ltd
http://whats.nu
bill@mail.nic.nu