[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [idn] RE: An idn protocol for consideration in making the requirements
- To: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: RE: [idn] RE: An idn protocol for consideration in making the requirements
- From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 19:13:17 -0800
- Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 19:12:58 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
At 09:39 AM 2/8/00 +0900, Martin J. Duerst wrote:
>I think that all else equal, it is clearly better not to define
>something new.
Correct. All other things are far from equal in this case.
> And there are good arguments besides aesthetics for it.
Specifics, please.
>So this requirement should stay in, but as a Should, not a Must.
It's not in the current draft; it is a proposed addition. There have been
people who have spoken in favor and against it.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium