[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Proposed suggestions from Asia Pacific Top LevelDomain meeting
- To: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: [idn] Proposed suggestions from Asia Pacific Top LevelDomain meeting
- From: Kenny Huang <huangk@alum.sinica.edu>
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 19:36:40 +0800
- CC: James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>, Dongman Lee <dlee@icu.ac.kr>, iname@aptld.org, bill@mail.nic.nu, konishi@jp.apan.net, kwu@yam.com, syhan@cclab.konkuk.ac.kr, markk@netsol.com, zwh@cnnic.net.cn, chang@netpia.com, tinwee@pobox.org.sg, chon@cosmos.kaist.ac.kr, bmanning@ISI.EDU, kwu@yam.com.tw, hoho@iis.sinica.edu.tw, "³¯¤å¥Í" <wschen@ccms.nkfu.edu.tw>, "¼BÀR©É" <tgcn143@attglobal.net>, huangk@alum.sinica.edu
- Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 03:37:27 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
One comment :
On issue 6 : Do we want to consider non alphanumberic US-ASCII ?
Implementations of the DNS protocols must not place any restrictions
on the labels that can be used. That's the principle of RFC2181.
This constraint also push many encoding and multilingual systems
out from the specification.
My suggestion is : we disagree with the recommendation on issue 6.
I am concerned that the effect may be to enforce an ASCII base in
order to mandate UTF-5 by stealth.
Kenny Huang
huangk@alum.sinica.edu
James Seng wrote:
>
> Is this the only comment from the inputs from APTLD? Are there any
> disagreement about the recommendation? Or is there any other recommendation
> for the draft-00 in general.
>
> If there is, please try to do before 10th March (dateline for IETF)
>