[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[idn] Requirements I-D
- To: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: [idn] Requirements I-D
- From: James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 02:38:39 +0800
- Delivery-date: Sat, 13 May 2000 11:42:03 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idn-requirements-02.txt
I proposed to remove the following requirements: [6], [8], [12], [17], [32],
[36], [38], [39] and to tone-down/rewrite: [4], [9], [33].
In addition, we need to discuss the section on canoicalization, this section
is most problemtic :P
i think we can work on this section in 2 ways.
1. continue to bash our head against on this section; or
2. remove the whole section and leave it to open for the proposal.
Lastly, take a look at the number of RFCs we need to review.
*cheers*
-James Seng