[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Re: DNSSEC compatibility
- To: idn@ops.ietf.org, droyer@naino.net
- Subject: Re: [idn] Re: DNSSEC compatibility
- From: James Seng <James@Seng.cc>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:39:41 +0800
- Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:42:30 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
---
From: "David Royer" <droyer@naino.net>
To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
References: <200008161715.NAA09718@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: [idn] Re: DNSSEC compatibility
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:27:37 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
> > There shouldnt be any reason why IDNs could not be integrated with
DNSSEC...
>
> depends on whether IDNs can be implemented within the DNS protocol or not.
And I hope it's not gonna be that way. They should be independent.