[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Unicode tagging
UCS-2 or UCS-4? Correct me if I am wrong, if you are using UCS-2, please
explain how you going to use those incoming Han ideograph into Plane 2?
UTF-8 isnt that bad for current Han ideograph 3400-F900. It translate to
3 bytes. Current native encodings takes 2 bytes anyway.
-James Seng
Edmon wrote:
>
> > > Wouldnt using uniform byte-length characters largely solve the
> problem?...
> >
> > no. that would just make the queries and responses larger than necessary.
> >
>
> This is not true... UTF-8 is consistently lengthier for Chinese than UCS-2
>
> > Keit
>
> Edmon