[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] UTC feedback
- To: RJ Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
- Subject: Re: [idn] UTC feedback
- From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:34:16 -0400
- cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:34:28 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
> That aside, the proposed workaround is unreasonable in languages where
> a character without its accent is really different from a character
> with its accent.
presumably, in those languages, you would not register the different
spellings of a label (with and without accents) - you would only
register the correct spelling.
a registry has an intersting policy question if it is faced with
requests to register two labels in the same zone, which are in
different languages, when there's a conflict according to the rules
of one language but not the other.
Keith