[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd)
- To: James Seng <James@Seng.cc>
- Subject: Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd)
- From: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 07:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: Kenneth Whistler <kenw@sybase.com>, idn@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 07:17:16 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
James,
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, James Seng wrote:
> NSI Registry approached is that for each domain names in any languages,
> you have to submit different encoding you wish to support. In other
> words, if you registered YAHOO.com in (where YAHOO is in Chinese) in
> GBK, you have to submit another application that you like this to be in
> BIG5.
why is this an optimal solution?
> So no, NSI Registry does knows encoding != language. They are not
> clueless as most people likes to think NSI Registrar is.
I never implied that NSI Registry was clueless.
> Additional application of encoding per domain name does not neccessary
> means it is additional registration, neither does it implies there is
> addition cost. I believe that details have not work into the RRP yet.
AFAIK, only an encoding tag will be added to RRP.
> I am wearing multiples hats here so pardon me if I have to be careful
> what I am allowed to say and what is not (yet), e.g. Clarification of
> public knowledge.
could you disclose your hapt, do you work for NSI Registry?
thanks,
-rick