[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted
- To: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
- Subject: Re: [idn] Internationalized PTR draft submitted
- From: James Seng <James@Seng.cc>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:38:55 +0800
- Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 19:43:33 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
Rick,
You asking the wrong person. :-) I am not the author of the I-D altho Hongbo
Shi keep me in the loop while she is writing the I-D.
I was originally confused about her approach too until she explain to me that
it is possible you want to have multiples names for a single machine/IP but in
different languages.
It is like saying "okay, I am a Japanese OS and I want the Japanese name of
this IP if possible, otherwise, I take the next best bet." Her original idea
was to let the server choose which to return. I suggested that she return
everything and let the client choose the best they want.
-James Seng
Rick H Wesson wrote:
>
> James,
>
> Why must we always talk about the origin "language?" If the domain names
> have been RACE encoded then they were eventually converted to UTF-16 which
> basicly covers all "languages."
>
> My meager understanding of RACE and Unicode 3.0 concludes we SHOULD ban
> the word "language" from our discussion/drafts and replace it with
> charset.
>
> Since we could have *any* string of UTF-16 encoded chars what point is it
> to maintain the origional language? Infact if we had the following
> hostname, which should be legal (U-0F3C U-0726 U-35A6) which "language"
> would go in the "language" tag? The above are one Tibetan, one CJK and one
> unknown....
>
> Please educate me on the utility of maintaining the description "language"
> or charset for that matter, once you're in UTF-* you should be able to go
> to any other charset!
>
> -rick
>
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, James Seng wrote:
>
> > example of an IPTR RR:
> >
> > 1.2.3.4.IN-ADDR.ARPA. IPTR "language" "name-in-utf8"
> >
> > [RFC1766] describes the ISO 639/ISO 3166 conventions. A language name
> > is always written in lower case, while country codes are written in
> > upper case. The "language" field in an IPTR RR MUST follow the con-
> > ventions defined in [RFC1766].
> >
> > For Example:
> >
> > 4.3.2.1.IN-ADDR.ARPA. IPTR "zh-cn" "name-in-utf8"
> > 4.3.2.1.IN-ADDR.ARPA. IPTR "zh-tw" "name-in-utf8"
> > 4.3.2.1.IN-ADDR.ARPA. IPTR "ja-jp" "name-in-utf8"
> > 4.3.2.1.IN-ADDR.ARPA. IPTR "ko-kr" "name-in-utf8"
> >