[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-cjk-00.txt
- To: "Karlsson Kent - keka" <keka@im.se>, <idn@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-cjk-00.txt
- From: "James Seng" <James@Seng.cc>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 10:58:24 +0800
- Delivery-date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 20:05:35 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
Missed this out :-)
> If I understand correctly, z-variants is the font variation
> for a SINGLE UCS CJK ideographic character (and still listed
> separately in 10646-1:2000; though never listed separately
> in the Unicode standard).
Yes, zVariant can be considered font variation. HOWEVER, some *are* listed as
separate code point in Unicode, to preserve round-trip. So, the problem isnt
so simple.
> Or do you mean something else with "z-variants"?
> Z-variants are font variations of the same character.
> The Y-variants are different-looking characters
> with the "same" meaning; I don't know how language
> dependent that is.
Hmm, I guess the problem zVariant is also cross with Y-variant.
For example, U+838A and U+8358. (Okay, this comes from two different languages
so you may considered it as just a Y problem, not a typeface problem).
But how would you classify U+6046 and U+6052.
-James Seng