[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8?
- To: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>, "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
- Subject: Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8?
- From: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 19:23:11 +0900
- Cc: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 07:00:28 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
At 00/12/25 19:24 -0800, Rick H Wesson wrote:
>Dan,
> > Can you please identify the systems, explain how they use domain names,
> > and say what exactly you mean by ``crash-and-burn''? We need this
> > information if we're going to accurately assess the cost of upgrading
> > the world to support IDNs.
>
>well if i had the time to do the through investigation and write the I-D
>on it. For now I'll just default to the wizdom of our AD, and the protocol
>design committee's decision to find a new ACE.
I hold the wisdom of our ACs in high honor, but I agree with Dan
that there should be a detailed list of software, version,
problem caused,... Without that, we risk to make decisions
based on hearsay, rumors, and FUD. As noted recently, even
with ACE, many things can and will go wrong according to
the Murphy principle.
Regards, Martin.