Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8?

["J. William Semich" <bill@mail.nic.nu>]

Yes. Windows 2000 Professional -  Multililanguage version.

See: 
http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/guide/professional/solutions/multilingu
al.asp

"Unicode Support:
Windows 2000 Professional uses Unicode® version 2.1 as its base character
encoding. Unicode is an international standard representing the characters
in common use in the world’s major languages. Unicode allows unambiguous,
plain-text representation of data, which simplifies data sharing in a
mixed-platform environment."

Using UTF-8. Even its text editor (Notepad) is UTF-8 capable.

You asked <smile>.

Bill Semich

At 04:01 PM 1/3/01 +0000, Brian W. Spolarich wrote:
>On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Patrik [iso-8859-1] Fältström wrote:
>
>| Because of these things, I none of the operating systems etc which
>| today use UTF-8 handle this correctly. All of them have to be changed.
>
>  Is there an OS out there that actually handles UTF-8 cleanly for the
>entire Unicode repertoire?  Sun touts Unicode support (via UTF-8) in
>Solaris, but its still pretty broken.
>
>  -bws
>
>
>
>