[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-uri-00.txt
- To: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-uri-00.txt
- From: "Adam M. Costello" <amc@cs.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:30:57 +0000
- Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:32:07 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> wrote:
> Good names never include uppercase non-ASCII characters.
That would solve the problem, but at a price. ASCII names are allowed
to use mixed case. It would be unfair to deny the same flexibility to
non-ASCII names. Maybe it's worth sacrificing that flexibility for the
sake of simplicity, but it's something to consider.
> If your mail software has small limits on address length, switching
> userhost from a UTF-8 IDN to an ACE IDN will drastically increase your
> chance of hitting those limits.
UTF-8 gets less than 6 bits per octet on average for the non-ASCII
octets, and the ACEs generally use base-32, which is 5 bits per
character, so that's not much different. And since some of the ACEs
employ compression techniques, they might even be shorter than UTF-8 for
many strings.
AMC