[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] The Business Card problem (was: Re: An experiment withUTF-8 domain names)
- To: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
- Subject: Re: [idn] The Business Card problem (was: Re: An experiment withUTF-8 domain names)
- From: GIM Gyeongseog-KIM Kyongsok <gimgs@asadal.cs.pusan.ac.kr>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:47:08 +0900 (KST)
- cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:49:57 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, John C Klensin wrote:
> --On Tuesday, 16 January, 2001 16:01 +0900 GIM Gyeongseog-KIM
> Kyongsok <gimgs@asadal.cs.pusan.ac.kr> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, John C Klensin wrote:
> >
thanks for your exmpales.
> No, except that the DNS supports synchronized changes to
> coordinated entries very poorly.
...
> But, if, e.g., one implements this as (using IPv4 as an example)
> as
>
> <hangeul-domain-name>. IN A 10.1.2.3
> <english-name-for-same-enterprise>. IN A 10.1.2.3
>
> And then tries to make a change, such as to re-home the host,
> the two names may, due to differences in usage, take
> significantly different times to propagagate.
i am somewhat confused here. this situation can happen
with ordinary (i.e., non-IDN) domain names.
i would like to know whether you claim the above problem is
the DNS problem in general or a problem specific with IDNs?
> john
±è °æ¼®, ºÎ»ê´ë Á¤º¸ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °øÇкÎ;
KIM Kyongsok/GIM Gyeongseog, Busan National Univ.
gimgs@HANGEUL.cs.pusan.ac.kr, http://HANGEUL.cs.pusan.ac.kr/hangeul/
Ph: (051) 510-2292, Fax: (051) 515-2208