Re: [idn] ACE, ACE-UTF-8, UTF-8

["James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>]

This is a good idea but not in this sense.

At the last San Diego meeting, there is a strawpoll on the Protocol
Recommendation on "ACE on Application now but do not reject the possibility of
longer term solution in future".

It is important to note that "longer-term solution" does not imply it is
"UTF-8" or any solution in particular.

It is only a strawpoll so a consensus on the WG (ie. this mailing list) is
still needed.

Comments please.

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "GIM Gyeongseog-KIM Kyongsok" <gimgs@asadal.cs.pusan.ac.kr>
To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 8:01 PM
Subject: [idn] ACE, ACE-UTF-8, UTF-8


>
> > ACE-now-and-forever
> > ACE-now-UTF-8-later
> > UTF-8-now-and-forever
>
>   since there seems to be no consensus as to the popularity of these,
> can we vote?
>   of course, the populairty should not necessarily be the basis
> for adoption of one of these within IDN WG.
>
>
> ±è °æ¼®, ºÎ»ê´ë Á¤º¸ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °øÇкÎ;
>   KIM Kyongsok/GIM Gyeongseog, Busan National Univ.
>   gimgs@HANGEUL.cs.pusan.ac.kr, http://HANGEUL.cs.pusan.ac.kr/hangeul/
>   Ph: (051) 510-2292, Fax: (051) 515-2208
>
>