Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes

["James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>]

Dear all,

I would like to re-emphasis a few 'consensus' in the meeting in San
Diego.

a) Requirements I-D to move to Last Call after last minor edition.

b) Strawpoll agrees with Protocol Design Team recommendation to focus
   on "ACE on Application" now but do not rejecting a longer term
   solution in future.

c) Strawpoll agrees that the Nameprep Design Team is working in the
   right direction. (See Nameprep-02)

If you have any objection (I know a few of you do), please raise them
now.

If there is no major objection, then the next step would include

1. Zita will do the Requirements -04 and we will move to Last Call.

2. Protocol Design Team (or someone) should start working on writing
   an I-D for the IDN Protocol. As it stands now, IDNA seem the closest
   we have.

3. An ACE Design Team may be form to investigate what is the correct
   ACE to use for (2).

In additional, I would also like to propose to update the Goals and
Milestone section of the WG Charter to reflect our progress more
accurately.

Your comments would be appreciated.

-James Seng