[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes
- To: "Sung Jae Shim" <sshim@mailbox.fdu.edu>, <idn@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes
- From: "James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 06:29:36 +0800
- Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:32:31 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
I apologise. Yes, Shim is right. The relevant portion of the minutes as
follows.
-James Seng
--- CUT HERE ---
DL: is the consensus of the working group to be focusing on an
application
area approach. Should we stop looking at infrastructure approaches.
<half the room>
HA: this does not mean the infrastructure need replacing. just that
this
WG is not the one to do it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sung Jae Shim" <sshim@mailbox.fdu.edu>
To: "James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>; <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 6:27 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes
> >
> > b) Strawpoll agrees with Protocol Design Team recommendation to
focus
> > on "ACE on Application" now but do not rejecting a longer term
> > solution in future.
>
> I don't recall that straw poll agrees to focus on "ACE on
Application". But
> I recall that straw poll agrees to focus on "Application Area
Approach."
> Please take a look at the minutes.
>
> Sung Shim
>
>