[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8
- To: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8
- From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
- Date: 2 Feb 2001 00:03:37 -0000
- Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 16:24:30 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
- Mail-Followup-To: idn@ops.ietf.org
I've sent nameprepped UTF-8 names through many programs without trouble.
It's really quite rare for a UNIX program to mangle 8-bit characters.
(Sendmail is an exception, because of its clumsy string handling.)
Of course, programs that align text on a terminal---for example, mail
clients such as Mutt, and editors such as Emacs---have to understand the
width of a UTF-8 string. In most cases they already do, and in other
cases the upgrades will be done soon.
UTF-8 IDNs will also need mail clients to assume that message header
fields use UTF-8. I'm counting this upgrade and redeployment as part of
the cost of UTF-8 IDNs.
Keith keeps claiming that there are many more programs that would have
to be upgraded for UTF-8, but he refuses to name any of those programs.
Am I the only person who thinks our decisions should be based on facts?
---Dan