[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Any system anywhere" (Re: [idn] The report from the design team)
- To: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>, idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: "Any system anywhere" (Re: [idn] The report from the design team)
- From: Harald Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:34:08 +0100
- Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 07:48:33 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
At 20:53 13/02/2001 -0800, Eric A. Hall wrote:
>IMO we should be treating IDNS the same way. We are limiting ourselves by
>an artifical and unreasonable restriction when we demand that all
>proposals must "allow any system anywhere to resolve any internationalized
>domain name." That requirement should be removed from the spec completely.
I believe the intent of the paragraph was to say "allow any system anywhere
THAT IMPLEMENTS THE IDN SPECIFICATION to resolve any internationalized
domain name".
The scenario it was aimed to prevent was one where multiple enclaves of
"IDN" names existed, where one could not resolve those names without
passing through the gateways for that particular enclave.
I propose the version above (without caps) as replacement text.
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no