[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep

To: "James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>
Subject: Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:24:42 -0500
cc: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>, idn@ops.ietf.org, brunner@nic-naa.net
Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 06:28:26 -0800
Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com

...
> > Registrars will forbid strings that have [some particular property,
> > the specific instance omitted from the original as irrelevant to the
> > mechanism/policy issue.]
> 
> And you assumed only Registrars will put names into DNS entries? I have
> not realised that DNS has evolved to a stage where it become a property
> of Registries and Registrars only.

What other mechanism(s) do you have in mind? What scope(s) does these
independant mechanism(s) and policy (policies) have?

Prev by Date: [idn] Comments on IDN requirement
Next by Date: Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep
Prev by thread: Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread