[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] An open letter to the IDN WG (long)

To: "Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>,"Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Subject: Re: [idn] An open letter to the IDN WG (long)
From: "Edmon" <edmon@neteka.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:58:23 -0500
Cc: "Patrik Faltstrom" <paf@cisco.com>,<idn@ops.ietf.org>,<brunner@nic-naa.net>
Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 04:54:40 -0800
Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com

> Just to be sure we understand Mssrs Lee, Geng, Nian, and Xiang work, could
> you explain why they presented a (GBK|Big5)/utf-8 implementation
experience
> report, if their interest was something other than encoding issues?
>
Correct me if I am wrong but I think that one of the main theme of CNNIC's
presentation I think is that it also explain the distaste for ACE and the
importance of local encoding support for the transitory solution.  I believe
that failure to cater to this might cause eager implementers to sway away
from the proposed standard, at least in the transitory period.
Edmon


> Cheers,
> Eric


Shop online without a credit card
http://www.rocketcash.com
RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary

Prev by Date: RE: [idn] An open letter to the IDN WG (long)
Next by Date: Re: [idn] An open letter to the IDN WG (long)
Prev by thread: RE: [idn] An open letter to the IDN WG (long)
Next by thread: Re: [idn] An open letter to the IDN WG (long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread