[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] IDNs in email message bodies
- To: "idn working group" <idn@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: [idn] IDNs in email message bodies
- From: "Maynard Kang" <maynard@pobox.org.sg>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:32:13 +0100
- Delivery-date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:32:50 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
> > However, I agree that ACE should be 'converted' for display, and
> > strictly for display only. This is analogous from mail clients
> > detecting mail / url addresses and hyperlinking it.
>
> I disagree. I don't think it is analogous. Hyperlinking the text may
> add underlines or color, but it does not change the text itself.
>
> The recipient, looking at the message body, should ideally see the
> same thing the sender saw when composing the message body. If the
> message body contains Chinese characters XXX.cn, then that's what
> should be displayed. But if the message body contains ASCII characters
> bq--xxx.cn, then that's what should be displayed, because that's what
> the sender saw and intended for the recipient to see.
I think most will fully agree that bq--xxx.cn in bodies should be displayed as it is.
But how about bq-xxx.cn in headers, especially headers which contain an addr-spec, route or domain? That is the tricky bit.
maynard