Re: [idn] wg milestones update

[wenhui zhang <zwh6810@yahoo.com>]

hello

  Where is the latest
version(draft-ietf-idn-requirements-05.txt,)
requirement.

thanks

wenhui
 
--- James Seng/Personal <James@Seng.cc> wrote:
> Read RFC2026. The WG process should not be stop or
> delay due to IPR DoS
> on the WG.
> 
> On the position on dealing with Walid patent, this
> decision has to come
> from the WG (ie individual members), not the
> co-chairs. We can only
> gather the decision from the members to decide how
> to move forward.
> 
> -James Seng
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J. William Semich" <bill@mail.nic.nu>
> To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 12:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [idn] wg milestones update
> 
> 
> > Marc - what is the position on dealing with the
> Walid patent in this
> process?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > At 07:32 AM 4/26/2001 -0400, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > > the milestones in the current charter are
> overdue. As said during
> > >minneapolis, the chairs had the task to propose
> new milestones to the
> > >wg.  Here is our proposal.
> > >
> > >Marc & James
> > >
> > >May 01 Submit Requirements I-D to IESG for
> Informational RFC
> > >May 01 WG decision on IDN Protocol
> > >May 15 Second version of Comparison I-D
> > >Jun 01 Last Call on Comparison I-D
> > >Jul 01 Final revision of IDN protocol I-D(s)
> > >Aug 08 London IETF: final discussion on IDN
> protocol I-D(s)
> > >Aug 15 Last Call on IDN Protocol I-D(s)
> > >Sep 01 Submit Comparison I-D to IESG for
> Informational RFC
> > >Sep 01 Submit Protocol I-D(s) to IESG for
> standard track RFC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/