Re: [idn] Zone rules (was: wg milestones update)

[deng@pier.cnnic.net.cn (deng)]

>Adam wrote:
 
> The second difference is that case equivalence is intuitive.  Any
> person who knows the letter "a" also knows that "A" and "a" are the
> same letter (even if you put diacritics on them, and even when they
> appear in words of an unknown language).  I don't think this is true
> of traditional/simplified Chinese characters.  If I'm not mistaken,
> many people from China cannot read many of the traditional characters,
> and many people from Taiwan, Hong Kong, etc. cannot read many of the
> simplified characters.  And as others have pointed out, the equivalence
> holds in Mandarin but not in Japanese (and I would guess not in
> Cantonese and other Chinese languages, but I don't know).
> 

I can not read some traditional Chinese characters and some simplified Chinese characters,but I want to register some Chinese domain name which include traditional or simplified Chinese characters. These are two different problems.

Deng Xiang
2001.5.3



>