[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastructure?
- To: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>,<idn@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastructure?
- From: "Russ Rolfe" <rrolfe@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 15:32:40 -0700
- Delivery-date: Fri, 11 May 2001 15:34:13 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
- Thread-Index: AcDXEtX4bXGNTNHDQr6vQozQvlpBCgAA9LnQ
- Thread-Topic: [idn] iDNS transition: end-system vs. infrastructure?
Dave Crocker wrote: 7 May 2001
Hence, the primary concern for "just do pure UTF-8" is
> the effect of sending UTF-8 to an aDNS server. However the nature of
> DNS is such that a DNS field with a UTF-8 string only gets sent to a
> server that is supposed to be able to resolve the that field.
Since we are looking at alternatives depending on the Walid proposal and
"just do pure UTF-8" is an alternative, could someone kindly post a
simple list of the reasons they feel "Just do pure UTF-8" is *not* a
valid alternative. I am still not convinced that we should not just use
pure UTF-8.
Regards, Russ Rolfe
Microsoft