Re: [idn] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-requirements-06.txt

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>]

Mr. Seng,

It is not. When the authors respond to my question I'll be in a position to
judge which change to suggest. Mr. Klensin is quite capable of offering yet
another suggestion.

If you would be so kind as to provide a pointer to the versions which had a
conflict with [30] I would appreciate it. I don't have -01 - -04 at hand (if
I ever did), and never would have noticed [30] if momentary circumstances had
not given me pause to think. I trust you don't mean CCS or CES or charset
uniqueness. If you ment the -06 [17], then there is a possible overlap of
requirements with -06 [30]. My longer note to Jony covered this, the use of
"8" (digit) as a alpha-tuple in Algonquin family orthographies, e.g., in the
Canadian Maritimes, Northern New England and Quebec -- W8banakia. Of course
-06 [17] can be read as flatly contradicting -06 [30].

I'm at a loss as to what to make of your sudden politness.

Eric