[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Why we can go directly to UTF-8
- To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
- Subject: Re: [idn] Why we can go directly to UTF-8
- From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 21:36:45 -0700
- CC: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Thu, 24 May 2001 21:37:30 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
- Organization: EHS Company
"D. J. Bernstein" wrote:
>
> Eric A. Hall writes:
> > The number of systems which will break with UTF-8
>
> Details, please.
>
> My UNIX list at the bottom of http://cr.yp.to/proto/idn.html includes
> gethostbyname() (some versions of which have already been fixed), mutt,
> pine, and sendmail. Are you claiming that something else needs to be
> upgraded? If so, what? We want verifiable facts.
If I had kept a list of every device and application that broke when a
customer of mine thought "_" was legal, I'd gladly give it to you.
Those systems enforce LDH, and will reject non-LDH sets.
--
Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/