[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] report of the straw poll
- To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: [idn] report of the straw poll
- From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 20:25:27 -0700
- Delivery-date: Fri, 25 May 2001 20:26:46 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
At 11:11 AM +0800 5/26/01, James Seng/Personal wrote:
>Verisign is moving ahead to put RACE into their .COM zone would means
>wide deployment of RACE and also applications (or servers) to be
>developed to support resolutions. They may or may not be IDNA or even
>close to the what we like to be.
VGRS *might* put RACE into the .com zone, or they might do the more
rational thing and wait for the ACE Design Team's report. It is not
appropriate to say what VGRS will or will not do in the future; that
changes all the time.
Section C of Appendix K of the agreement between VGRS and ICANN
reserves all RACE names for ICANN; VGRS needs permission before they
can add them to the TLDs.
Why is any of this relevant to the straw poll?
>But the fact that this is happening is somewhat of a concern as it may
>undermine the work we are doing in this Working Group as it *might* lead
>to an industry driven protocol.
Or it might not.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium