[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8
- To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
- Subject: Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8
- From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 12:19:23 -0700
- Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Sat, 26 May 2001 12:22:41 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
Careful migration is always more complicated and, in some ways, more
expensive than a simple switchover.
The problem is with the disruption caused by a "simple" switchover.
d/
At 10:16 AM 5/26/2001, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
>Dan writes:
> > The people saying ACE/IDNA say it is quickest and least disruptive
> > to non-IDN aware software. Those wanting UTF-8 thinks this format
> > is best for internationalisation and fear that starting with IDNA
> > will result in ACE forever.
>
>I have a much more serious concern: the short-term costs of deploying
>ACE appear to be much larger than the total costs of moving directly to
>UTF-8. See http://cr.yp.to/proto/idn.html for details.
>
>---Dan
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464