[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs
- To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs
- From: "Bruce Thomson" <bthomson@fm-net.ne.jp>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 14:52:51 +0900
- Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 23:00:42 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
> I haven't made any such proposal. then again, you haven't made a proposal
> either. for once, you are applying the same delusions to others that you
> apply to yourself. I suppose that is an improvement.
This WG would do better if cryptic statements and personal attacks could
be reduced. For example, the above statement could have been phrased
more like:
"I haven't made a '7-bit forever' proposal. My proposals could be more
accurately characterized as '<characterization>' ."
In this way, those of us who aren't sure of what Kieth's proposals are
would be educated, and those of us who don't care about WG members'
delusions could be spared having to think about them.