Re: [idn] Report from the ACE design team

[Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>]

At/À 12:23 2001-06-27 +0200, Dan you wrote/vous écriviez:

> >I would like to echo Marc comments here. I think compression should be
> >first most important criteria over complexity.
>
>It depends on WHY we use ACE.
>
>If ACE is used as a transition mechanism, simplicity is most important.

whatever transition it is, it will be long.

>If ACE is intended to be used forever

if transition is long, then long ~= forever.

>(also probably meaning that
>we will hav 63 byte limit forever), compression is most important.

so we are in agreement!, compression is most important ;-)))

Marc.



>I think this is one thing you should take up in the London IETF.
>
>-
>My very much preferred choice is: ACE as transition mechanism.
>
>    Dan