Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (ACE+UTF-8)

[deng@pier.cnnic.net.cn (deng)]

> -James Seng wrote:
 
> Secondly, "chair" in English which take up 5 Unicode character would
> only take two Unicode ideographic character in Chinese. Thus, is 63
> Unicode character 'fair' for all? This is a topic I hate to dive into
> here.
> 

The length limitation is a problem which is belong to technological 
discussiale category.

Chinese character is ideographic character, it means that each character 
has meaning. so if we want to translate a Chinese character into English, 
in many cases,we should use several English words(not just several letters). 
Reverse, if we want to translate a English word into Chinese, it's same.

In DNS, there is no meaning, just codepoint which user choose, and user 
want to express some meaning. From this point,there is no different among 
Unicode.

Deng xiang