[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (ACE+UTF-8)

To: idn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (ACE+UTF-8)
From: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 12:29:45 +1000
Delivery-date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 19:32:41 -0700
Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:20:13 -0400." <007a01c100e9$ac734520$1001a8c0@neteka.com>
Sender: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org


> - uses EDNS to allow longer labels than 63 bytes.

	EDNS is useless for this.  See the experience with bitstring
	labels deployment.  Extending the label size has the same
	problems.  In both cases you are using the new label types
	in the question and not in only in the answer.

--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com

References:
- Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (ACE+UTF-8)
  - From: "Edmon" <edmon@neteka.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (ACE+UTF-8)
Next by Date: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-lsb-ace-00.txt
Prev by thread: Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (ACE+UTF-8)
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Who supports UDNS (ACE+UTF-8)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread