Re: [idn] THis WG derailed ?

["Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>]

I am not sure  what you mean by "significant" effect.

I think shorter ACE labels benefits  :

 1. save momory resources
     shorter IDN zone file
     save memory space of  intermediate DNS/Web cache servers
     shorter log file for dns/web/mail transactions
     shorter Http cookie cache entries 

 2. reduce traffic
    shorter DNS queries
    shorter HTTP host: header value
    shorter SMTP session from to:  and rcpt to: tags
    
 3. for human
    more easy to transcript
    good for administrators to manage leaked ACE labels
    registrants cannot avoid ACE labels now and near future


For, <Samsung Electronics  in Korean> ( 4 hangul syllables)

U+C0BC U+C131 U+C804 U+C790

DUDE-02  : 6s7Nt2P3vF93E      13       
LDUDE     : 5s7AB4BB             8 ( 5 chars, 38% shorter )


<Hyundai  Develpoment Company in Korean> ( 6 syllables)
U+D604 U+B300 U+C0B0 U+C5C5 U+AC1C U+BC1C

DUDE-02  : 7yyEyxsEzv5AxzFy37JtssA    ( 23 )
LDUDE     : 5syMRtAB3FB                      11 ( 12 chars, 52% shorter )




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith Moore" <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: "Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>
Cc: <idn@ops.ietf.org>; "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [idn] THis WG derailed ? 


> > This WG  should focus on issues of AVERAGE length of ACE lables.
> 
> why?  do you have some evidence that this has a significant
> effect on performance of ANY protocol?
>