Re: [idn] THis WG derailed ?

["Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>]

We already have ACE alternatives ** NOW **.

How much time  do you expect  to be taken
in order to improve or replace DUDE ?
1 week or 1 month of delay?  That's too long to wait for?

Can you demonstrate  whom  and how much
code simplicity  benefits ?  ACE codes are compiled into
binary codes in *HUGE* NAMEPREP & KC Norm libraries.

soobok

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith Moore" <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: "Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>
Cc:<idn@ops.ietf.org>; "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [idn] THis WG derailed ? 


> > I am not sure  what you mean by "significant" effect.
> 
> I mean the burden is on you to demonstrate that it's worth
> the trouble that would be required to further reduce the 
> average length of label representation, and you haven't yet
> provided any support for this argument.
> 
> the question is not whether there are benefits, the question
> is whether they are worth the extra complexity and overhead,
> and the additional delay in getting IDNs out the door.
> 
> Keith
>