[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] average length



changed to subject to a more appropriate one!

At/À 09:35 2001-07-10 +0900, Soobok Lee you wrote/vous écriviez:
>This WG  should focus on issues of AVERAGE length of ACE lables.

Don't understand why. Average number of octets doesn't help me.
However, the max length do change the maximum length of chars that I may use.

I probably don't understand your point.

Marc.


>We have not enough time for the debate around max ACE label length.
>We have already many useful ACE alternatives
>to overcome this 14-han barrier easily.
>
>bare DUDE produces  long and complex ACE lables for average length of
>han/hangul domains, while DUDE's algorithm seems to be simple.
>We have no justification for why we should sacrifice
>label simplicity for code simplicity,
>while we already have very HUGE mapping tables
>and algorithms in NAMEPREP and KC Norm.
>ACE codes are written once and copied and executed many times.
>Output label simplicity matters.
>
>No one has provided the right reason
>to exclude needs for the following names.
>What does it GIVE us  to ban people from registering them?
>What does ACE code simplicity give us ?
>
>Soobok
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>ONE EVIDENCE from Chinese Gov for domains of 16 han letters.
>
>(SC1) Simplified Chinese String  1 : ( 16 letters )
>       <ministry of foreign trade and economic cooperation, PRC>
>       u+4e2d u+534e u+4eba u+6c11 u+5171 u+548c u+56fd u+5bf9
>       u+5916 u+8d38 u+6613 u+7ecf u+6d4e u+5408 u+4f5c u+90e8
>
>       DUDE-02 : w8wpt7ydt79euu4mv7yax9puzb7seu8r7wuq85umt27ntv2bv3wgt\
>                 5xe795e ( 60 chars )
>       LDUDE   : xswjuzru6nu7fv7kv4gutrwgb7mbwiu6cuzqqxm
>                 ( 39 chars, 35.0% shorter )
>       AMCW    : w8up29ps5kdst5uh7ygsup29pm3cb39n8tknpb39hkygswhdysupa\
>                 qd ( 55 chars )
>       LAMCW   : xsujwxgu3kwwrv3fwvduunykm5ab9jwvmuwfmta
>                 ( 39 chars )
>
>
>ANOTHER EVIDENCE from korean site names of 18 hangeul letters.
>
>
>(K3) Korean String 3:  ( 18 hangul syllables )
>       U+C804 U+AD6D U+C2E4 U+C9C1 U+B178 U+C219 U+C790 U+B300
>       U+CC45 U+C885 U+AD50 U+C2DC U+BBFC U+B2E8 U+CCB4 U+D611
>       U+C758 U+D68C
>
>       DUDE-02 : 62yEyxyJy92J5uFz25JzvyBx2Jzw3Az9wFw6Ayx7Fy92Nz3uA3tEz8\
>                 xNt44FttwJtt7E ( 68 chars )
>       LDUDE   : 5szAtBtvBt7Mt2Qv4Qu7KtFt5It3MuEvAtvDyJCtuC4G4J
>                 ( 46 chars,  32% shorter )
>       AMCW    : 62sEFmpKzeNqbGm2Ks3M6sG2aPcfNefFksKy6I96GziPfwRstM42Rwn
>                 ( 55 chars )
>       LAMCW   : 5stAsB5tvAGhmGmgG2mGatsE5t7JGbhsDvD5tsAyIK5swJ8RwG
>                 ( 50 chars )
>
>
>Average lenght hangeul domain:
>
>     (K4) Korean String 4:  ( 7 hangul syllables )
>       <Hynics Semiconductor in korean>
>       U+D558 U+C774 U+B2C9 U+C2A4 U+BC18 U+B3C4 U+CCB4
>
>       DUDE-02 : 7xvItuuNzx5PzsyPz85N97Nz9zA
>                 ( 27 chars )
>       LDUDE   : 5s3C4F5Q7PtwRtMK
>                 ( 16 chars,  40% shorter )
>       AMCW    : 7xxIM5wGyjKxeJa2G8ePfw
>                 ( 22 chars )
>       LAMCW   : 5s9CxH8JvE5tzMyAK
>                 ( 17 chars )
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org>
>To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 7:34 AM
>Subject: Re: [idn] ACE37
>
>
> > At 6:14 PM -0400 7/9/01, Edmon wrote:
> > >the
> > >capacity for CJK ideographs, which has been identified as an undeniable
> > >concern through the discussion on this mailing list
> >
> > The fact that a few people have expressed the concern without ever
> > giving any evidence for it is not "undeniable". So far, there has
> > been *no* evidence that a 15-character limit would restrict names
> > that would be used for a significant number of real-live,
> > actually-used host names. If you have any evidence to the contrary
> > (that is, names that would actually be used in DNS names), please say
> > so ASAP.
> >
> > The concerns have all been for companies that want to register their
> > legal names. Well, the DNS will *never* allow all the companies that
> > want their legal names to do so. In the United States and throughout
> > Europe, legal company names include spaces, commas, periods,
> > apostrophes, ampersands, and so on. Those are not going to be allowed
> > in IDN names, so those companies will not be able to register their
> > legal names.
> >
> > --Paul Hoffman, Director
> > --Internet Mail Consortium
> >