[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8?
- To: idn working group <idn@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8?
- From: "Adam M. Costello" <amc@cs.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 02:29:42 +0000
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
"Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com> wrote:
> The format of a master file needs to be agreed on. This is required
> for DNS to operate properly.
Why? Zone transfers use the regular binary DNS message format, not the
text master file format. As far as I know, having a standard master
file format is not necessary for DNS to operate properly, but is a
convenience for DNS administrators because it allows them to switch to
a different server implementation without having to translate their
zone files. Some server implementations (like BIND) support extensions
to the master file format (like $GENERATE), and DNS administrators who
use such extensions assume the risk that if they switch to a different
server implementation, those extensions might not work. The same would
be true of an extension for supporting UTF-8. The extension for UTF-8
might be sufficiently useful that it becomes a standard extension, like
$TTL added by RFC 2308.
AMC