[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth

To: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
Subject: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:44:48 -0400
cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, "Adam M. Costello" <amc@cs.berkeley.edu>, idn@ops.ietf.org

> The only way that UTF-8 IDNs will get into the legacy path is if a
> particular implementation goes out of its way to use them where it
> shouldn't. It will have to explicitly call the new API and then explicitly
> pass data that is not supported by the application protocol. This scenario
> is completely unrealistic.

This is complete and utter nonsense, and I'm not going to dignify it
further by continuing the discussion.

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth
Next by Date: Re: [idn] new list of wg documents and next steps
Prev by thread: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread