[idn] Proposed agenda v2.0 ietf-london

[Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>]

At 8:50 AM -0400 8/7/01, Marc Blanchet wrote:
>Hi,
>  here is a first cut of the proposed agenda. The idea here is to 
>leave room for concensus building.

The first proposed agenda has a lot of valuable time spent giving 
presentations about Internet Drafts. Although this has been common in 
the IDN WG (and many other WGs) at past IETF meetings, it is probably 
not a good use of the WG's time, given our limited meeting slot. 
People at the meeting should have read the drafts before the meeting, 
and the meeting should be used for discussing technical merits and 
consensus building.

Original proposal:

>  agenda bashing, 1 min., Marc Blanchet
>  wg update, 5 min., Marc Blanchet
>  ACE encoding
>   ACE comparison, 5 min., Yoshiro Yoneya
>   Reordering, 5 min., Soobok Lee
>   ACE concensus building (Choosing an ACE if we need one), 5 min.
>  Matching
>   Nameprep update, 5 min., Paul Hoffman
>   TSconv, 5 min., Xiang Deng
>   Hangulchar, 5 min., Soobok Lee
>   Matching concensus building, 10 min.
>  Protocol
>   Protocol comparison, 10 min., Dave Crocker
>   Protocol concensus building, 55 min.
>  Conclusion and next steps, 10 min.

Proposal without Internet Draft presentations:

  agenda bashing, 1 min., Marc Blanchet
  wg update, 5 min., Marc Blanchet
  ACE encoding
   ACE comparison, 5 min., Yoshiro Yoneya
   ACE consensus building (Choosing an ACE if we need one), 10 min.
  Matching
   Matching consensus building, 20 min.
  Protocol
   Protocol comparison, 10 min., Dave Crocker
   Protocol consensus building, 60 min.
  Conclusion and next steps, 10 min.

Do other folks at the London meeting agree with this proposed agenda revision?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium