Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence

["Edmon" <edmon@neteka.com>]

Hi Eric,
I dont really have a specific "policy" in mind, its just some scenarios that
I think needs consideration when making such policies.
Edmon


----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@nic-naa.net>
> In a previous note I commented on the scaling issue I understand this form
> of [30] (registrant assigned equivalence rules, vs zone manager assigned
> equivalence rules, in obsoleted versions of the requirements draft) to
pose.
> Insight into proposed mechanism and its scaling properties would be of
real
> interest.
>
> I also suggested to the earlier proponent of this form of [30] that s/he
> attempt to state a variation of [30] that would express his or her, and
now
> your, desired policy.
>
> Eric