[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence
> Hi, Ben,
> .tw is used mostly by users who want TC characters,
> and .cn users mostly wants SC characters. As a service
"used mostly" is not good enough. Either they use all TC or all SC.
If not, then there must be a SC/TC equivalence
> provider, you can display .tw as .taiwan in TC, and display
> .cn as .china in SC character set. When people click on
> the URL, you send out .tw to DNS instead of .taiwan in TC.
> This way you can provide what the user wants to see
> without bother DNS.
Yes, you are correct that .tw is the same as <.taiwan> and .cn is the
same as <.china>- BUT ONLY if the either the ISP or the client
downloaded special software. Also, TC and SC are used interchangeably
regardless of country so <.taiwan> does not mean TC and <.china> does
not mean SC. That is the whole point of TC<->SC equivalence.
Thanks
Ben Chan
>
> Liana
>
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2001 09:54:56 -0400 "ben" <ben@cc-www.com> writes:
> > Hi Liana,
> >
> > I am not sure I understand what you are trying to say.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ben Chan
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <liana.ydisg@juno.com>
> > To: <edmon@neteka.com>
> > Cc: <liana.ydisg@juno.com>; <klensin@research.att.com>;
> > <idn@ops.ietf.org>
> > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 3:24 PM
> > Subject: Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence
> >
> >
> > You got my point wrong. We are not in the same discussion
> > space. SC=TC discussion is only regarding font difference.
> > The semantics are basicaly the same, but the reader groups
> > are different. It may be said, this is analogy to Latin uppercase
> > and lowercase folding. As a registrant, if the choice is two
> > places: SC+TC, then it is a reality already, we don't need this
> > standard discussion right now. And to Ben Chan also,
> > we have TLD are doing exactly the same thing: .tw and .cn
> > too. As a server provider, you may choose to display .tw in TC,
and
> > cn
> > in SC as an equivalent solution to your suggestion without
> > get into this WG.
> >
> > Liana
> >