Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence

["ben" <ben@cc-www.com>]

Hi Edmon,

You are correct, TC-SC is indeed mixed and that is a reality.  I have
said all along that TC and SC are used interchangeably by certain
groups/cultures/background and that is why they are indistinguishable
to those people.

However, my question is "...can you come up with even one good reason
why we should allow a CDN to have mixed TC and SC?"

In other words, just because people mix them, a "supreme CDN system"
should not add to the confusion by allowing a CDN to have mixed TC and
SC (unless you can come up with even one good reason why I should then
I may modify my draft as necessary.)

Thanks
Ben Chan





----- Original Message -----
From: "Edmon" <edmon@neteka.com>
To: "ben" <ben@cc-www.com>; <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence


> Hi Ben
>
> Your observation:
> > However, can you come up with even one good reason why we should
allow
> > a CDN to have mixed TC and SC?
>
> is rather irresponsible.  TC-SC mix is already common place in HK.
>
> Edmon
>