Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence

[Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>]

% 
% Hi Eric,
% 
% > > I could care less about other registries and what they do.
% >
% > Then there is no IETF issue for you.
% >
% 
% My IETF issue is to get support for my "supreme CDN system" to be
% implemented as a standard.  Do I have your support?

	While I'll leave Eric to answer that question for himself,
	I am left cold by your attitude regarding IETF participation
	and consenses building. Until you are willing to learn from
	others and have responsible dialog, it is my opinion that
	you will not gain support for your flawed ideas.
	But, since you don't care about other registries, interoperability
	is not an issue... ergo, its not an IETF issue, your SCS is a closed,
	propriatary solution.  It will never be a standard.

% > ...
% > > then I will modify my draft.
% >
% > What draft?
% 
% I said "draft", I did not say "Internet draft".

	Again, what draft. Neither Eric or I mentioned "Internet Draft".
	Further evidence that your idea is closed and propriatary. Perhaps.
	
% Thanks
% Ben Chan


-- 
--bill