Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence

["Suzanne Topping" <stopping@rochester.rr.com>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>

> While there is an desire to solve 100% of the users problem today, all
> developments started with one small step at a time. Without solving the
> first 10%, we wont know what the next 10% problem. This wg is not the
> first nor will be the last one to solve the whole I18N problem. It is
> one of the puzzle piece for the IETF and there are many other puzzle to
> solve in future. So lets not put too much task upon ourselves.

This is not the only issue which is beyond the initial scope of the WG. Is
there a mechanism in place for putting these issues into a holding bin for
later work? IDN is sure to be an evolving system. The first pass will be
just that; the first. Not the final. We have to look at this evolution as a
phased event, and we won't all be happy with the first iteration.

Perhaps if people felt more confident that a path forward exists, and knew
the process for working within it, focus could be better aimed at what needs
to be dealt with immediately. James, can you please outline the WGs method
or plan for phasing in expanded levels of support? Does such a plan exist?

Suzanne Topping
BizWonk Inc.
stopping@bizwonk.com