Re: [idn] ietf london idn wg meeting minutes

["James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>]

> >ACE EVALUATION WITH IDNs ALREADY REGISTERED, Yoshiro Yoneya
> >
> >- Most important evaluation criterion to study is to maximize number
> >   of characters, raw speed is less important because nameprep is the
> >   slow stage.
>
> This is not correct in general. At my site which uses the Latin-1
subset
> of UCS, most ACE encodings are a very expensive step compared to
nameprep.

I am curious about this statement. Do you have any numbers for this?

You see, all datas from other sources, from Verisign, i-DNS.net, JPNIC
etc who have done Nameprep-ACE/UTF-8 have clearly shown that Nameprep ~=
10xACE in terms of CPU time.

http://www.i-d-n.net/ietf50/idn-minneapolis-implementors-zhuyu.ppt
http://www.i-d-n.net/ietf50/idn-implementors-colosi.ppt

ps: Sorry, only PPT since that is the presentation material given to us
by the presenter.

-James Seng