Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence

[Eric Brunner <brunner@nic-naa.net>]

>What you suggesting is that you wish to do Nameprep with charset in GB.
>This is to provide the unneccessary step to take
>GB->Unicode->Nameprep->ACE then ACE->Unicode->GB.
>
>While it seem to make sense on the surface, I think you have
>misunderstood the purpose of Nameprep. Nameprep is for matching purpose.
>The matching result remains in ACE. If I give you two GB string, you do
>a GB->Unicode->Nameprep->ACE then compare the two ACE. You dont reverse
>the ACE back to GB.

I think there was a moment where the fingers got ahead of the brain here.

> The matching result remains in ACE.

When did Nameprep become dependent upon a transport encoding?

Eric